Table of Contents
I 'd add Toyota 2/3TC electric motor is someplace in the leading three however with those domestics you definitely have my leading four of all time for dependability. Brian created: I miss my 4.9 truck. Never ever had an engine problem. Corrosion is a various story. When the exhaust rusted off behind the feline it simply seemed like a diesel.
I question just how hard a swap it would be to get it right into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a tough time leaving it's own way ... the 300i6 would do everything I need this vehicle to do patgizz composed: 3 things in the auto world refuse to damage.
those should be held as the standard to which whatever else is determined. Nearly whatever else fades in comparison. And the Toyota 2f/3f (based upon the chevy stovebolt 6 of program) Wow, because of the outpour of appreciation, it looked good so I purchased it, here's the ad lmk what you people assume Oops, really did not indicate to be cryptic, it slid my mind that the "5.0" was practically a 4.9 l.
first order of biz however, I'm relatively big, and the guiding wheel to seat is fairly narrow ... man that wheel cover was not ribbed for my satisfaction:-LRB- The only issue I've ever before seen with trucks like that, are busted shifters. Ford made them a little too tough and they would certainly break right at the floorboard.
Keep in mind the gas mileage will not be the best in the globe, however it will damn sure run for life. Never had an engine issue.
When the exhaust rusted off behind the pet cat it just sounded like a diesel. In 4x4 it returned 15 mixed, 20 highway with the OD5. I question just how hard a swap it would certainly be to get it right into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a tough time leaving it's own way ... The engine bay had not been developed for anything longer than a Mod electric motor. One canister remove an engine from a '97 design F-150 from the top, but it sucks. Mod electric motors need to find out laterally and you need to pull the damper and water pump off of a 4.2. The core support does not unlock like in F250s and later on F150s.
WonkoTheSane composed: spitfirebill composed: In reply to HappyAndy: Thank you Captain Obvious What did he claim to warrant this? I'm truly curious. I really did not see anything in his reply that would certainly require this action. "They are usually reliable as gravity so long as they aren't sludged up" What engine enjoys sludge? Knurled composed: wbjones wrote: Brian wrote: I miss my 4.9 vehicle.
When the exhaust rusted off behind the cat it simply appeared like a diesel. I ask yourself just how hard a swap it would certainly be to obtain it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ...
Very really confined engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had already figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek article, that I didn't explain ... my bad In reply to spitfirebill: I added that factor since when I needed to discover a replacement 4.9 for my F150, I had to go through each in every junkyard in South Jacket to discover one that wasn't sludged up actually severely.
Bernie: Which is a much better van, while we're going to speak regarding a couple of concerns of these vans, but I I'm plainly not going to come out and state one is better than the other. Bernie: Well, they're basically the same vehicle.
Mark: So, well, let's start with engines then. Allow's speak concerning engine and actually simply to specify that the design years, we're going to start from 2000 and up, you recognize, I indicate, these vans have been around for a long time.
And, you know, for a variation of a Chevy van has actually been around since, you know, around that time too. Since 2000, I imply, Ford's, you can get these with V6 engines or V8s.
There's a whole lot of problems with these engines. In the earlier 2000 stimulate plugs with blow to these engines, due to the fact that they didn't have enough threading in the spark plug, which caused problems.
Extremely extremely confined engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had actually currently figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek post, that I really did not make clear ... my negative In respond to spitfirebill: I added that point since when I needed to find a replacement 4.9 for my F150, I had to go via every one in every junkyard in South Jersey to locate one that wasn't sludged up actually badly.
Bernie: Which is a much better van, while we're going to chat regarding a few concerns of these vans, but I I'm plainly not going to come out and state one is far better than the other. Bernie: Well, they're essentially the exact same car.
They appear to be a little much more made use of because area, but, you recognize, those are a few of the usages, however they're basically the exact same category of car. Mark: So, well, let's begin with engines then. What concerns do you see in between these two automobiles? Bernie: Yeah. So let's speak about engine and in fact simply to specify that the version years, we're going to begin with 2000 and up, you understand, I mean, these vans have been around for a very long time.
And, you know, for a variation of a Chevy van has been around given that, you know, around that time as well. We're not going to get back right into, into the earlier things. Considering that 2000, I mean, Ford's, you can obtain these with V6 engines or V8s. V8s are a lot a lot more prominent and I would not actually recommend a V6 engine.
There's a lot of concerns with these engines. In the earlier 2000 trigger plugs with impact to these engines, since they really did not have adequate threading in the stimulate plug, which triggered troubles.
Navigation
Latest Posts
Ford F150 dealer near me Tucson
Ford F150 dealership around Tucson
Ford F150 dealer near me Tucson, California